<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paleo kitchen experiments: chocolate mousse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paleo recipes: chocolate and orange mousse</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-8468</link>
		<dc:creator>Paleo recipes: chocolate and orange mousse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-8468</guid>
		<description>[...] was time to create a variant on the original chocolate mousse recipe which both Chris and I love.  You can’t beat a chocolate and orange combination! Paleo chocolate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was time to create a variant on the original chocolate mousse recipe which both Chris and I love.  You can’t beat a chocolate and orange combination! Paleo chocolate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammi</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-5230</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-5230</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a standard bar of plain dark chocolate - I suspect what I&#039;m calling a &quot;bar&quot; is what you mean by a &quot;brick&quot;.  You need to read the label carefully though.  In the homebaking sections of supermarkets the plain chocoalte is usually only about 40% cocoa and still contains lots of sugar and milk solids, but in the confectionary area you should be able to find cocoa that is 70% or better for cocoa content.  If you check the ingredients label it should say what percentage of the ingredients is cocoa solids - though once you get to the higher percentage bars they tend to advertise the percentage with the brand on the front.

I tend to use 85% for cooking and eating at home because I can get brands of that which are relatively &quot;cheap&quot; from the big supermarket where we do most of our shopping and I&#039;m not bothered enough by the slight sugar and milk content to pay significantly more for something that we have so rarely as a treat.  If I had more cash to spare I would stick with 90% or 100% cocoa content bars.  Lindt do a 90% cocoa chocolate bar which is relatively easy to get hold of in the UK but you often have to hunt about at specialist chocolateries for 100% chocolate (we&#039;ve currently got some in the cupboard from Fortnum &amp; Mason and some from Hotel Chocolat - both were Christmas presents).  If you are based in another country you may find there are other brands (Cote d&#039;Or do a divine 100% chocolate which is very smooth on the tongue but I&#039;ve not found it outside Belgium).  Green and Blacks do 90% and 100% cocoa content chocolate too.  Larger supermarkets (and often not the bottom end budget ones) tend to be the easiest places to get really dark chocolate but you may find that you have to order it online if nowhere you go stocks genuinely dark chocolate.

On the point about dark chocolate (that isn&#039;t 100% cocoa content) still containing sugar and milk solids, it is technically correct that this wouldn&#039;t therefore be paleo.  However, most paleo advocates still allow a square or two of dark chocolate as a treat from time to time - just go as dark as you can bear to keep the potential digestive/gut irritants to a minimum.  We would never have anything &quot;lighter&quot; than 85% at home now - while 70% is the most easily available dark chocolate in the UK we find it too sweet because the sugar content is too high for our tastebuds.  At the other end of the spectrum, 100% can take some getting used to (and working up to, by gradually adjusting your palette to higher cocoa content levels) and a lot depends on the brand - I&#039;ve found that once you are at 100% the skill and method behind how the bar is prepared starts to impact far more heavily on how bitter/crumbly/smooth/dry the chocolate can taste and behave in your mouth, so if you don&#039;t like one it doesn&#039;t mean you won&#039;t like any of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a standard bar of plain dark chocolate &#8211; I suspect what I&#8217;m calling a &#8220;bar&#8221; is what you mean by a &#8220;brick&#8221;.  You need to read the label carefully though.  In the homebaking sections of supermarkets the plain chocoalte is usually only about 40% cocoa and still contains lots of sugar and milk solids, but in the confectionary area you should be able to find cocoa that is 70% or better for cocoa content.  If you check the ingredients label it should say what percentage of the ingredients is cocoa solids &#8211; though once you get to the higher percentage bars they tend to advertise the percentage with the brand on the front.</p>
<p>I tend to use 85% for cooking and eating at home because I can get brands of that which are relatively &#8220;cheap&#8221; from the big supermarket where we do most of our shopping and I&#8217;m not bothered enough by the slight sugar and milk content to pay significantly more for something that we have so rarely as a treat.  If I had more cash to spare I would stick with 90% or 100% cocoa content bars.  Lindt do a 90% cocoa chocolate bar which is relatively easy to get hold of in the UK but you often have to hunt about at specialist chocolateries for 100% chocolate (we&#8217;ve currently got some in the cupboard from Fortnum &amp; Mason and some from Hotel Chocolat &#8211; both were Christmas presents).  If you are based in another country you may find there are other brands (Cote d&#8217;Or do a divine 100% chocolate which is very smooth on the tongue but I&#8217;ve not found it outside Belgium).  Green and Blacks do 90% and 100% cocoa content chocolate too.  Larger supermarkets (and often not the bottom end budget ones) tend to be the easiest places to get really dark chocolate but you may find that you have to order it online if nowhere you go stocks genuinely dark chocolate.</p>
<p>On the point about dark chocolate (that isn&#8217;t 100% cocoa content) still containing sugar and milk solids, it is technically correct that this wouldn&#8217;t therefore be paleo.  However, most paleo advocates still allow a square or two of dark chocolate as a treat from time to time &#8211; just go as dark as you can bear to keep the potential digestive/gut irritants to a minimum.  We would never have anything &#8220;lighter&#8221; than 85% at home now &#8211; while 70% is the most easily available dark chocolate in the UK we find it too sweet because the sugar content is too high for our tastebuds.  At the other end of the spectrum, 100% can take some getting used to (and working up to, by gradually adjusting your palette to higher cocoa content levels) and a lot depends on the brand &#8211; I&#8217;ve found that once you are at 100% the skill and method behind how the bar is prepared starts to impact far more heavily on how bitter/crumbly/smooth/dry the chocolate can taste and behave in your mouth, so if you don&#8217;t like one it doesn&#8217;t mean you won&#8217;t like any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Just wondering when you say &quot;200g dark chocolate&quot; is that in a solid brick form?...and is it actually without milk, sugar etc?  I was not aware there was pure cocoa in a solid form.  Is it hard to find?  The recipe sounds great and thanks for sharing!  Lynne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Just wondering when you say &#8220;200g dark chocolate&#8221; is that in a solid brick form?&#8230;and is it actually without milk, sugar etc?  I was not aware there was pure cocoa in a solid form.  Is it hard to find?  The recipe sounds great and thanks for sharing!  Lynne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy First Birthday!</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-1429</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy First Birthday!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-1429</guid>
		<description>[...] Women, Recent Glute News, Intermittent Fasting and (to counteract the fasting I suppose) the chocolate mousse recipe.  Not wanting to read too much into all this other than to notice that everyone seems to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Women, Recent Glute News, Intermittent Fasting and (to counteract the fasting I suppose) the chocolate mousse recipe.  Not wanting to read too much into all this other than to notice that everyone seems to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ammi</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Ammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 17:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Not yet, but it is on the list for this summer...  Glad you enjoyed the mousse.  It is one of our favourites at home too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not yet, but it is on the list for this summer&#8230;  Glad you enjoyed the mousse.  It is one of our favourites at home too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.njamworld.com/2009/11/03/chocolate-mousse/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 11:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.njamworld.com/?p=540#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>I have just started the paleo diet and was worried about missing out on all my favourite foods and desserts I wouldn&#039;t be able to have anymore. So far I have cooked and eaten foods better than I ever have in my entire life, and this chocolate mousse definitely reinforced my realization that this diet is not only the most healthful but can also be the most delicious! So thank you for posting this recipe. :) Did you ever end up trying the raspberry and coconut mousse idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just started the paleo diet and was worried about missing out on all my favourite foods and desserts I wouldn&#8217;t be able to have anymore. So far I have cooked and eaten foods better than I ever have in my entire life, and this chocolate mousse definitely reinforced my realization that this diet is not only the most healthful but can also be the most delicious! So thank you for posting this recipe. <img src='http://www.njamworld.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Did you ever end up trying the raspberry and coconut mousse idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

